Participatory Educational Research

Participatory Educational Research

Attitudes of Foreign Language Teaching Students and Teachers about Interactive Whiteboards

Yazarlar: Neşet MUTLU

Cilt 4 , Sayı 2 , 2017 , Sayfalar 221 - 226

Konular:Eğitim, Bilimsel Disiplinler

Anahtar Kelimeler:Interactive white boards,Attitude,Foreign language teaching

Özet: In this study, researcher tried to understand Foreign Language Teaching (English Language Teaching – ELT, and German Language Teaching – GLT) students’ and teachers’ attitudes on interactive whiteboard (IWB) that they would use in foreign language teaching. A descriptive study was selected by using survey method. In this respect, data were gathered from 210 ELT and GLT students and 8 teachers from these two language teaching departments in Erciyes University. Two questionnaires prepared by Manny-Ikan, Tikochinski, Zorman and Dagan (2011) were administered to understand attitudes of students and teachers: Teacher Attitudes Questionnaire (TAQ) and Students Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). According to results; students mostly see learning via the IWB is enjoyable, easier, understandable, favourable, and interesting. Moreover, teachers mostly expressed that instruction with IWB is more enjoyable, brings more workload, allows better access to up-to-date learning materials, and contributes teachers’ professional development.


ATIFLAR
Atıf Yapan Eserler
Henüz Atıf Yapılmamıştır

KAYNAK GÖSTER
BibTex
KOPYALA
@article{2017, title={Attitudes of Foreign Language Teaching Students and Teachers about Interactive Whiteboards}, volume={4}, number={2}, publisher={Participatory Educational Research}, author={Neşet MUTLU}, year={2017}, pages={221–226} }
APA
KOPYALA
Neşet MUTLU. (2017). Attitudes of Foreign Language Teaching Students and Teachers about Interactive Whiteboards (Vol. 4, pp. 221–226). Vol. 4, pp. 221–226. Participatory Educational Research.
MLA
KOPYALA
Neşet MUTLU. Attitudes of Foreign Language Teaching Students and Teachers about Interactive Whiteboards. no. 2, Participatory Educational Research, 2017, pp. 221–26.