International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences

Yazarlar: Susi Dian RAHAYU

Konular:Sosyal

DOI:10.18769/ijasos.367305

Anahtar Kelimeler:Local election,Voting behaviour,Elite,Slum

Özet: This paper aims to analyse of comparative of voting behaviour between elite and slum areas at Local Election of Jakarta 2017. How the comparative of voting behaviour in elite and slum areas are the question of this research. The results of this research are: The first, in elite areas polling station (PS) 6 Pegangsaan, the winner of the local election first round are Ahok-Djarot. They are an incumbent who have some issues like blasphemy, relocation inhumane, and any others. But, in other hand many people argue that Ahok-Djarot is best choice for governor and vice governor for Jakarta because of their achievement in last period, like the cleaning of Ciliwung river, public transportation, and relocation slums areas. But, at second round of local election, Ahok – Djarot are loss in there because most of voters AHY (candidate who loss at first round) voted Anies-Sandi. The most of Ahok-Djarot voters in polling station (PS) 6 said that they are not influenced by a variety of negative issues of the candidate. Second, in slum areas Polling station (PS) 52 Bukit Duri, the winner of the local election are Anies-Sandi. Anies- Sandi are Muslim candidate who have many achievement and their character are friendly, polite and have a good manner. Most of Anies-Sandi voters sure that if Anies-Sandi being governor and vice governor of Jakarta, policy of relocation will be held humanity with emphasis on dialogue. By the result of research, the conclusion is most of voters in Jakarta used rational and sociology factor for their reason to choose governor and vice governor.

---