International Journal of Global Education
Yazarlar: Gina Berridge, Lori Eggers Saxby, Kelly Sparks, Clarissa Willis
Konular:-
Anahtar Kelimeler:-
Özet: Research supports the importance of metacognitive awareness as a means of monitoring and promoting reading comprehension. The purpose of this study was to examine the reading habits including comprehension strategies college students use when reading, and the impact those strategies have on reading ability. Comprehension strategies were defined as conscious processes students use to understand and process what they read. A 26 question survey was developed that incorporated a list of comprehension strategies and from the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) developed by Mokhtari and Reichard (2002). Most of the college freshman in this study appeared not to have the comprehension and metacognition skills needed to strategically engage and interact with academic texts. Based on these results, the authors suggest that students placed in developmental reading courses at colleges and universities would benefit from explicit and systematic teaching of comprehension and metacognition strategies to understand the complex and critical text that post-secondary education requires. Keywords: literacy, metacognitive awareness, explicit teaching References ACT Attainment of College and Career Readiness (2014). Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr14/readiness.html ACT National Curriculum Survey (2012). Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/NCSPolicySummary2012.pdf Armstrong, S. L., & Newman, M. (2011). Teaching textual conversations: Intertextuality in the college reading classroom. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), 6-21. Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886-924. Bailey, T., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S. W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255-270. Baker, L. (2008). Metacognition in comprehension instruction: What we’ve learned since NRP. In C.C. & S.R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Researched-based best practices (pp. 65-79). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Biemiller, A. (2006). Vocabulary development and instruction: A prerequisite for school learning. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 41-51). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Cantrell, S. C., Correll, P., Clouse, J., Creech, K., Bridges, S., & Owens, D. (2013). Patterns of self-efficacy among college students in developmental reading. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(1), 8-34. Coles, M., & Hall, C. (2002). Gendered readings: Learning from children’s reading choices. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(1): 96–108. Cox, R. (2009). The college fear factor: How students and professors misunderstand one another. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K., E. (2003). Reading can make you smarter! Principal, 83(2), 34-39. Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching them to read (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Boston University Press. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 43(10), 906-911. Flippo, R. F. (2011). Transcending the divide: Where college and secondary reading and study research coincide. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(6), 396-401. Fountas I., & Pinnel G. (2006). Teaching for comprehension and fluency. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Gallagher, K., & Allington, R. L. (2009). Readicide: How schools are killing reading and what you can do about it. Stenhouse Publishers. Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 1-29. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A. Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231-256. Hock, M., & Mellard, D. (2005). Reading comprehension strategies for adult literacy outcomes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 18(3), 192-200. Hodges, L. C. & Stanton, K. (2007). Translating comments on student evaluations into the language of learning. Innovative Higher Education, 31(5), 279–286. Holschuh, J. P. & Paulson, E.J. (2013). The terrain of college developmental reading. Executive Summary and Paper Commissioned by the College Reading and Learning Association. Honig, B., Diamond, L., & Gutlohn, L. (2008). Teaching reading sourcebook (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Arena Press. Honig, B., Diamond, L., & Gutlohn, L. (2013) Teaching reading sourcebook (updated 2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Arena Press. Jennngs, J., Caldwell, J., & Lerner, J. (2010). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 71-80. Lewin, T. (2005, August 17). Many going to college are not ready, report says. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., & Wright, P. (2012). Gender differences in reading motivation: Does sex or gender identity provide a better account? Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 328-336. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ megacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C. A., & Gardner, A. (2009). The impact of Internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(7), 609-619. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA’s progress in international reading literacy study in primary schools in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Digest of education statistics 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2013). The Nation’s report card: Trends in academic progress. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2012/2013456.aspx National Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved from www.ncte.org/standards/ncte-ira. National Endowment of the Arts. (2007). To read or not to read: A question of national consequence. Retrieved on August 6, 2015 from http://arts.gov/sites/default/files/ToRead.pdf Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M.L. (2000). College studying. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 645-666). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Otterman, S. (2011, June 14). College-readiness low among state graduates, data show. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com Paris, Scott G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, 1, 15-51. Pintrich, P. (2012). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. In R. Hodges, M.L. Simpson, & N.A. Stahl (Eds.), Teaching study strategies in developmental education, (pp. 229-239). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s. SAT Report on College and Career Readiness. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.collegeboard.org/program-results/2014/sat Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (1994). The reading habits of developmental college students at different levels of reading proficiency. Reading Improvement, 31(3), 156-166. Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (1997). Perspectives on learning history: A case study. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(3), 363-395. Simpson, M.L., & Nist, S. L. (2000). An update on strategic learning: It’s more than textbook reading strategies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(6), 528-541. Simpson, M. L., & Rush, L. (2003). College students' beliefs, strategy employment, transfer, and academic performance: An examination across three academic disciplines. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 146-156. Smith, M. (2012, August 4). Struggling for students’ readiness. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, XXI(4), 360-406. Temple, C., Ogle, D., Crawford, A., & Freppon, P. (2014). All children read: Teaching for literacy in today’s diverse classrooms (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Tompkins, G. (2014). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Tierney, R. J. (1990). Redefining reading comprehension. Educational Leadership Retrieved from http://www.ascd.com/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199003_tierney.pdf Vandal, B. (2010). Getting past go: Rebuilding the remedial education bridge to college success. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skills: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73-86.