Fiscaoeconomia

Fiscaoeconomia

Art! In What Sense?

Yazarlar: Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY

Cilt 1 , Sayı 3 , 2017 , Sayfalar 156 - 163

Konular:İşletme

DOI:10.25295/fsecon.334861

Anahtar Kelimeler:Danto, Hegel, Pop Art, Warhol

Özet: This paper is a critique of the conception of art which is mainly based on Arthur Danto’s definition of art via Hegelian aesthetics. In 1964, when Danto encountered with Andy Warhol’s Brillo Box a renewed era for the definition of art has come. For Hegel one of the most crucial criteria for art-work is its indispensible adequacy between content and presentation. Although Danto as a philosopher is so much Hegelian by the time of modern art there emerges a historical shift within art and this article tries to reveal how Danto departs from Hegel through the philosophical question of what makes any work an art-work. When there renders no ‘bodily’ distinction between content and presentation, there emerges an essential question: According to what one of the Brillo boxes inside a grocery store is just an ordinary box while the other one is such a precious artwork in Soho Gallery.


ATIFLAR
Atıf Yapan Eserler
Henüz Atıf Yapılmamıştır

KAYNAK GÖSTER
BibTex
KOPYALA
@article{2017, title={Art! In What Sense?}, volume={1}, number={3}, publisher={Fiscaoeconomia}, author={Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY}, year={2017}, pages={156–163} }
APA
KOPYALA
Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY. (2017). Art! In What Sense? (Vol. 1, pp. 156–163). Vol. 1, pp. 156–163. Fiscaoeconomia.
MLA
KOPYALA
Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY. Art! In What Sense? no. 3, Fiscaoeconomia, 2017, pp. 156–63.