European Endodontic Journal

Yazarlar: Sebastian Schlafera, Javier Garciaa, Rikke L. Meyerb, Michael Væthd, Klaus W. Neuhaus

Konular:-

DOI:10.14744/eej.2018.55264

Anahtar Kelimeler: Adhesion,Biofilm,DNase,Enterococcus faecalis,Endodontic biofilms,Extracellular DNA,Microbiology

Özet: Extracellular DNA (eDNA) has been shown to be important for biofilm stability of the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis. In this study, we hypothesized that treatment with DNase prevents adhesion and disperses young E. faecalis biofilms in 96-well plates and root canals of extracted teeth. Methods: E. faecalis eDNA in 96-well plates was visualized with TOTO-1®. The effect of DNase treatment was assessed in 96-well plates and in extracted single-rooted premolars (n=37) using a two-phase crossover design. E. faecalis was treated with DNase (50 Kunitz/mL) or heat-inactivated DNase for 1 h during adhesion or after 24 h of biofilm formation. In 96-well plates, adhering cells were quantified using confocal microscopy and digital image analysis. In root canals, the number of adhering cells was determined in dentine samples based on colony forming unit counts. Data from the 96-well plate were analyzed using one-tailed t-tests, and data from extracted teeth were analyzed using mixed-effect Poisson regressions. Results: eDNA was present in wells colonized by E. faecalis after 1 h of adhesion and 24 h of biofilm formation; it was removed by DNase treatment, as evidenced by TOTO®-1 staining. DNase treatment reduced the area covered by cells in 96-well plates after 1 h (p<0.05), but not after 24 h (p=0.96). No significant differences in the number of adhering cells were observed in extracted teeth after 1 (p=0.14) and 24 h (p=0.98). Conclusion: DNase treatment does not disperse endodontic E. faecalis biofilms. The sole use of DNase as an anti-biofilm agent in root canal treatments is not recommendable.

---