Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi

Yazarlar: Mehmet YALIN, Hakan ULUTAŞ

Konular:İnşaat Mühendisliği

DOI:10.28948/ngumuh.896637

Anahtar Kelimeler:Performance analysis,Nonlinear method,Comparison of TSC 2007 and TSC 2018 regulations

Özet: In this study, the seismic performance of an existing school-type building with a wall-framed system with longitudinal reinforcements arranged with non-ribbed reinforcement steel was determined according to both Turkish Seismic Code (TSC-2007) and Turkish Seismic Code (TSC-2018) and the two codes were compared based on the results. According to the TSC (2018), if the longitudinal reinforcement of the reinforced concrete elements is arranged with non-ribbed reinforcement steel, this steel should be multiplied by the strain request and the plastic rotation request by 1.5 needs to be increased. Since there was no such requirement in TSC (2007), it was thought that it would be more appropriate to choose an existing school-type building with non-ribbed reinforcement to compare the two regulations. Analyses were carried out using the non-linear elastic evaluation method. The comparison between the performance results of the two regulations illustrated that the incompatibility between the regulations is for earthquakes with a 2% probability of exceeding in 50 years. It has been determined that while the Y direction of the building has achieved the target performance level according to TSC (2007) for earthquakes with a probability of exceeding 2% in 50 years, it cannot achieve the target performance level according to TSC (2018)

---