Aksaray İletişim Dergisi

Yazarlar: Uğur GÜNDÜZ, İs ARIKAN

Konular:İletişim

Anahtar Kelimeler:Power,Turkish Media,Crisis,Turkey,Israel,Critical Discourse Analysis

Özet: Most of the nation states emerged as constituent states, creating a homogeneous nation, and the existing territories and power as anxiety of protection in this way. The mentioned protection and / or protection practices are the most prominent case; in the framework of the nation-state mission, our international peoples, which we have defined through our national-national values, and the practices that we produce with the measures we take with all national means. The media, on the other hand, have come to the forefront as the greatest power of the century in convincing societies. In this context, the main concern of the study is to determine how and to what extent the media, which is the subject of controversy in the context of an adjective ranging from ‘the fourth power to the first one’, can become functional in the axis of national and international anxiety and interests. In this framework, the Israeli judge of the Turkish press tried to put forward various newspapers. In this context, the crisis between Turkey and Israel between 2009 and 2010 has been examined. The newspapers examined are Hürriyet and Cumhuriyet newspapers, each of these newspapers; the period has emerged as a journalist with different general publishing policies. The headings of the first pages of the newspapers were discussed and the samples were analyzed in accordance with the analysis of the general purpose discourse. The method of examination was based on the critique of discourse analysis, developed by Professor of Linguistics Professor Norman Fairclough, who said, ‘Discourse is a field of struggle.’ The aim is to reflect how the chosen words in the titles reflect the language used by the producer-based press, the relationship with power, the ideological background, the religious outlook, and the target mass.

---