Tokat İlmiyat Dergisi
Yazarlar: Ali MUSTAFA
Konular:-
Anahtar Kelimeler:Hadith controversy,Understanding (command) of hadith
Özet: Ulema have showed care about hadith controversy (muhtelefu’l-hadis) nowadays as they did in the past in terms of method and application; have sort out outwardly contradictory hadiths as naskh, cem and election by determining the bases and traces of these hadiths. However, in some cases a disagreement may be matter of question in these base and methods. For instance, it is possible the application of many rules to resolve disagreement in the hadith. So that, with the application of each of these may result in changes in ecclesiastical law. Thus, which of these procedural rules should be preferred? Our study, focusing on the practical aspects is working to answer this question