Mantık Araştırmaları Dergisi

Yazarlar: Khaled EL-ROUAYHEB, Sacide ATAŞ

Konular:Mantık

Anahtar Kelimeler:Logic,Anti-Logicism

Özet: In the present article, I discuss Goldziher's contention (echoed in more recent literature) that from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, Sunni Muslim scholars ('ulama') became increasingly hostile to rational sciences such as logic. On the basis of discussions andfatawa by Sunni scholars in the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, I show that this idea is radically mistaken. Mainstream scholars in the Maghrib, Egypt and Turkey considered logic to be not only permissible but actually commendable or even a religious duty incumbent on the Muslim community as a whole (i.e. a fard kifayah). Though there were dissenting voices in the period, such as the Qadizadelis, this seems to have been the mainstream opinion of Sunni scholars until the rise of the Salafiyyah movement in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

---